The Science of Siblings is a new series exploring the ways our siblings can influence us, from our money and our mental health all the way down to our very molecules. We’ll be sharing these stories over the next several weeks.
This is something I learned years ago through gay bar chatter: Gay people are often the youngest kids in their families. I liked the idea right away — as a gay youngest sibling, it made me feel like there was a statistical order to things and I fit neatly into that order.
When I started to report on the science behind it, I learned it’s true: There is a well-documented correlation between having older siblings (older brothers, specifically) and a person’s chance of being gay. But parts of the story also struck me as strange and dark. I thought of We the Animals, Justin Torres’ haunting semi-autobiographical novel about three brothers — the youngest of whom is queer — growing up in New York state. So I called Torres to get his take on the idea.
Torres’ first reaction was to find it considerably less appealing than I did. This makes sense — his latest novel, Blackouts, won a National Book Award last year, and it grapples with the sinister history of how scientists have studied sexuality. “My novel is interested in the pre-Kinsey sexology studies, specifically this one called Sex Variants,” he told me. “It’s really informed by eugenics. They were looking for the cause of homosexuality in the body in order to treat it or cure it or get rid of it.”
That’s why, when he saw my inquiry about a statistical finding that connects sexuality and birth order, he was wary. “To be frank, I find these kinds of studies that’re looking for something rooted in the body to explain sexuality to be kind of bunk. I think they rely on a really binary understanding of sexuality itself,” he said.
“That’s fair,” I conceded. But this connection between queerness and older brothers has been found so many times in so many places that one researcher told me it’s “a kind of truth” in the science of sexuality.
Rooted in a dark past
The first research on this topic did indeed begin in the 1940s and ’50s, during that era of investigations into what causes homosexuality, to be able to cure it. At the time, the queer people whom scientists were studying were living in a world where this facet of their identity was dangerous. Plus, the studies themselves didn’t find much, says Jan Kabátek, a senior research fellow at the University of Melbourne.
“Most of it fell flat,” he told me. “But there is an exception to this, and that is the finding that men, specifically, who exhibit attraction to the same sex are likely to have more older brothers than other types of siblings.”

In the 1990s, this was dubbed the “fraternal birth order effect.” In the years since, it has been found again and again, all over the world.
“This pattern has been documented around Canada and the United States, but it goes well beyond that,” says Scott Semenyna, a psychology professor at Stetson University. “There’s been now many confirmations that this pattern exists in countries like Samoa. It exists in southern Mexico. It exists in places like Turkey and Brazil.”
Huge study, consistent findings
An impressive recent study established that this pattern held up in an analysis of a huge sample — over 9 million people from the Netherlands. It confirmed all those earlier studies and added a twist.
“Interestingly enough — and this is quite different from what has been done before — we also showed that the same association manifests for women,” explains Kabátek, one of the study’s authors. Women who were in same-sex marriages were also more likely to have older brothers than other types of siblings.
At baseline, the chance that someone will be gay is pretty small. “Somewhere around 2 to 3% — we can call it 2% just for the sake of simplicity,” Semenyna says. “The fraternal birth order effect shows that you’re going to run into about a 33% increase in the probability of, like, male same-sex attraction for every older brother that you have.”
The effect is cumulative: The more older brothers someone has, the bigger it is. If you have one older brother, your probability of being gay nudges up to about 2.6%. “And then that probability would increase another 33% if there was a second older brother, to about 3.5%,” Semenyna says.
If you have five older brothers, your chance of being gay is about 8% — so, four times the baseline probability.

Still, even 8% is pretty small. “The vast majority of people who have a lot of older brothers are still going to come out opposite-sex attracted,” Semenyna says. Also, plenty of gay people have no brothers at all, or they’re the oldest in their families. Having older brothers is definitely not the only influence on a person’s sexuality.
“But just the fact that we are observing effects that are so strong, relatively speaking, implies that there’s a good chance that there is, at least partially, some biological mechanism that is driving these associations,” Kabátek says.
A hypothesis, but no definitive mechanism
For decades, the leading candidate for that biological mechanism has been the “maternal immune hypothesis,” Semenyna explains. “The basic version of this hypothesis is that when a male fetus is developing, the Y chromosome of the male produces proteins that are going to be recognized as foreign by the mother’s immune system and it forms somewhat of an immune response to those proteins.”
That immune response has some effect on the development of subsequent male fetuses, Semenyna says. The plausibility of this hypothesis was bolstered by a 2017 study that found “that mothers of gay sons have more of these antibodies that target these male-specific proteins than mothers of sons who are not gay or mothers who have no sons whatsoever,” he says.
But now that Kabátek’s study of the Dutch population has found that this pattern was present among women in same-sex marriages as well, there are new questions about whether this hypothesis is correct.
“One option is that the immune hypothesis works for both men and women,” Kabátek says. “Of course, there can be also other explanations. It’s for prospective research to make this clearer.”
Fun to think about, but concerning too
In a way, I tell Justin Torres, this effect seems simple and fun to me. It’s a concrete statistical finding, documented all over the world, and there’s an intriguing hypothesis about why it may happen biologically. But darker undercurrents in all of it worry me, like raising a dangerous idea that becoming gay in the womb is the only version of gayness that is real — or a repackaged version of the old idea that mothers are to “blame.”

“It is the undercurrents that worry me immensely,” he responds. “I remember when I was a kid — I have this memory of watching daytime television. I must have been staying home from school sick in the late ’80s or early ’90s. The host polled the audience and said, ‘If there was a test [during pregnancy] and you could know if your child was gay, would you abort?’ I remember being so horrified and disturbed watching all those hands go up in the audience — just feeling so hated. At that young age, I knew this thing about myself, even if I wasn’t ready to admit it.”
Even if tolerance for queer people in American society has grown a lot since then, he says, “I think that tolerance waxes and wanes, and I worry about that line of thinking.”
At the same time, he agrees that the idea of a connection with gay people being the youngest kids in their families is kind of hilarious. “One thing that pops into my mind is, like, maybe if you’re just surrounded by a lot of men, you either choose or don’t choose men, right?” he laughs.
Essentially, in his view, it’s fun to think about, but probably not deeper than that.
“As a humanist, I just don’t know why we need to look for explanations for something as complex and joyous and weird as sexuality,” Torres says.
Then again, scientists are unlikely to be able to resist that mysterious, weird complexity. Even if the joy and self-expression and community and so many other parts of queerness and sexuality will always be more than statistics can explain.
More from the Science of Siblings series:
- A gunman stole his twin from him. This is what he’s learned about grieving a sibling
- In the womb, a brother’s hormones can shape a sister’s future
- These identical twins both grew up with autism, but took very different paths
Transcript:
AILSA CHANG, HOST:
Did you know that people who are gay are more likely to have older brothers than other kinds of siblings? There’s actually research going back decades into this apparent connection between family makeup and sexuality. For our series on the science of siblings, NPR’s Selena Simmons-Duffin explores this phenomenon.
SELENA SIMMONS-DUFFIN, BYLINE: Justin Torres is a novelist. He’s also queer, and he’s the youngest in his family.
JUSTIN TORRES: I grew up with two older brothers. It was just the three of us, and it was pretty wild.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: He grew up in New York State and wrote about the three-brother dynamic in his first novel, “We The Animals.”
TORRES: As somebody who’s the youngest of three, I always have these intense moments of bonding with other people who are the youngest of three or four or five, right? Like it’s – it is a particular lived experience, I think.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: In his new novel, “Blackouts,” which won the National Book Award last year, Torres grapples with how scientists have studied sexuality.
TORRES: My novel is kind of interested in these kind of pre-Kinsey sexology studies, specifically this one called sex variance. You know, it was really informed by eugenics, and they were looking for the cause of homosexuality in the body in order to treat it or cure it or get rid of it.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: But despite their efforts, the researchers didn’t find much.
JAN KABATEK: Most of it fell flat, meaning that we still have very little idea about what underlies the origins of sexual orientation.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: That’s Jan Kabatek, a modern-day researcher at the University of Melbourne. There is one exception, though. The thing that scientists zeroed in on that seemed to actually hold up was this.
KABATEK: Men, specifically, who exhibit attraction to the same sex are likely to have more older brothers than other types of siblings.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: In other words, more families looked like that of Justin Torres, where the youngest brother is queer. In the 1990s, this was dubbed the fraternal birth order effect. In the years since, it’s been found again and again. Scott Semenyna is a psychology professor at Stetson University.
SCOTT SEMENYNA: This effect seems to show up pretty much everywhere that it’s examined, from different locales scattered around Canada and the United States, but it goes well beyond that. There’s been now many confirmations that this pattern exists in countries like Samoa. It exists in southern Mexico. It exists in places like Turkey and Brazil.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Here’s how the fraternal birth order effect plays out. At baseline, Semenyna says, the chance someone will be gay is really pretty small, like 2%.
SEMENYNA: The fraternal birth order effect shows about a 33% increase in the probability of, like, male same-sex attraction for every older brother that you have.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Got one older brother, like me, your chance of being gay nudges up to about 2.6%.
SEMENYNA: And then that probability would increase another 33% if there was a second older brother.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Then you’re looking at about 3.5%. If you have five older brothers, your chance of being gay is about 8%, so four times the baseline probability, but still kind of small.
SEMENYNA: The vast majority of people who have a lot of older brothers are still going to come out opposite-sex attracted.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Also, plenty of gay people have no brothers at all, or they’re the oldest in their families. This is definitely not the only influence on a person’s sexuality. Still, the consistency of this effect makes you wonder why. Why would it be that the more older brothers someone has, the more likely they are to be gay? Semenyna says there’s been a leading theory to explain this – the maternal immune hypothesis.
SEMENYNA: The basic version of this hypothesis is that when a male fetus is developing, the Y chromosome of the male produces proteins that are going to be recognized as foreign by the mother’s immune system, and it forms somewhat of an immune response to those proteins.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: And that immune response has some effect on the development of subsequent male fetuses. However, there has been a recent development when it comes to this explanation. Jan Kabatek, the researcher in Melbourne, analyzed a huge sample – more than 9 million people. He and his colleagues found yet again that people in same-sex marriages had lots of older brothers with a twist.
KABATEK: Interestingly enough – and this is quite different from what has been done before – we also showed that the same association manifests for women.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Women who were in same-sex marriages were also more likely to have older brothers than other types of siblings. He says now the game is on for scientists to figure out why.
KABATEK: It’s for the prospective research to make this clearer.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: So how does all of this sound to Justin Torres, a queer person who fits this pattern?
TORRES: It is the undercurrents that worry me.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Talking about this brings to mind a memory from watching daytime TV as a kid.
TORRES: You know, this is like the late ’80s, early ’90s. And I remember the host polled the audience and said, if there was a test and you could know if your child was gay, would you abort? And I remember just being so horrified and disturbed watching all those hands go up in the audience, you know, and just feeling so hated, you know?
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Even if tolerance for queer people in American society has grown a lot since then, he says…
TORRES: I think that tolerance waxes and wanes, and I worry about the line of thinking.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: At the same time, the idea that there’s a connection with gay people being the youngest kids in their families, he also finds it kind of hilarious.
TORRES: Like, one thing that pops into my mind is like, maybe if you’re just surrounded by a lot of men, you either choose or don’t choose men, right?
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: In other words, it’s fun to think about, but maybe not deeper than that.
TORRES: As a kind of humanist, I just don’t know why we need to look for explanations for something as complex and joyous and weird as sexuality.
SIMMONS-DUFFIN: Then again, how could scientists resist that mysterious, weird complexity, even if the joy and self-expression and community and so many other parts of queerness will always be more than statistics can explain?
Selena Simmons-Duffin, NPR News.


