Animated Loading
Having trouble loading this page? Get help troubleshooting.

Federal Judge Tosses Out Cranston Districting Plan

Published
Senior U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Lagueux ruled today that the city of Cranston violated the one person one vote Baker V. Carr standards when the...

  Senior U.S. District Court Judge Ronald Lagueux ruled today that the city of Cranston violated the one person one vote Baker V. Carr standards when the city allocated the entire population of the Adult Correctional Institutions as `residents’ of one city ward when it drew district borders for the city council and school committee.

The ruling concluded that Cranston artificially inflated the population of Ward 6 by treating all inmates of the ACI as residents of the prison for redistricting purposes.

``I’m thrilled that our fight for equal representation has been successful,’’ said Karen Davidson, lead plaintiff, in a news release. ``Fairness in redistricting is a fundamental right and I’m  glad the court has vindicated our claims.’’

Lagueux gave the city thirty days to redraw the districts.

The plaintiffs were represented in federal court by Demos, the Prison Policy Initiative and the ACLU of Rhode Island.

Cranston City Hall
Cranston City Hall